Designing for All Modes of Travel

I attended the North Central Section of the Institute of Transportation Engineers section meeting this morning.  It was a panel discussion on "Complete Streets."  The general idea is to balance service to private vehicles, transit users, bicycles, and pedestrians through the design of our transportation systems. Traditionally, vehicles have been the focus of our design with the other three modes treated as after thoughts.  FHWA has a website and the Institute of Transportation Engineers has a report on the topic. 

The most important tidbit I took away relates to the speed we are designing a road for.  Engineers typically design for a specific speed.  Often that is treated as a minimum.  So we'll design a 30 mph street that can actually be used safely at 45 mph.  The Complete Street method has us target the real design at 30 mph instead of overdesigning it.  That makes it more accessible for all users.

A good example of this concept in the Twin Cities is Excelsior Boulevard in St. Louis Park, MN.   It has on street parking bays, median islands, bus stops, and narrower than standard traffic lanes. 

I worked with Bill Weber at MFRA on a Guiding Plan for the B-2 District in Arden Hills, MN this past fall.  This is the area of the suburban city that would be considered downtown.  County Road E runs through the area and would be considered "Main Street."  County Road E is currently five lanes wide of black asphalt.  It isn't exactly pedestrian or bicycle friendly.  Bill and I worked on the re-design below for the County Road E corridor (which was adopted by the City).  I guess we were designing a "Complete Street" without using the jargon.CR E Cross Section with Bike Lanes (color)

Please note: I reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive or off-topic.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

2 thoughts on “Designing for All Modes of Travel

  1. Well that is impressive! You’ve got a write up posted an hour after the event! my guess is that “Complete Streets” criteria, if enacted at the county, state, or federal level, will include more “should” language instead of “shall”.